TODAY’S OBSERVATION

If this tech can solve these nervous system issues to a voluntary subject isn’t it then implicit that it can cause such in a non compliant subject :

If such an exhibition be a failure it is still important to understand the implications of the outcome of such human experimants. It is transhumanism. It seems immoral and a crime against humanity from my perspective. That is why people need to comply to be guineepigs or recruits. The best of the best…???

Like a hammer : on one particular day a carpenter can build a house with this tool on another day a carpenter with the same skills and education can bury a similar hammer in another humans skull. Why? Why do people hurt people for money or for pleasure or control?…

A man stated that technology is neutral in its isolated state – that suggests that tech is always taken out of neutral by its handler, the operator – even A.I that is automated can never be free of its initial production by the mind and hand of man and its binds to the limitation of thought inherent in its” creation” ; a secondary synthetic nature in regards to that which we call “life” “nature” the “source” that which can not be named {secularly speaking}…

…Once man uses thought and his hands to manifest a”thing” in the “material” world we have taken the step- it seems we cross the line when we seek to control or subjugate nature through artifice rather than live in accord through artifice