TODAY’S OBSERVATION

If we speak with another human and think, plan too much about what we are goimg to say, as we are with that person or before, the interaction becomes calculated less organic. If we edit what we are saying as we are having a conversation it can create a calculated and less natural conversation which is selfish a form of control and is the foundatiom of dishonesty. This is not to say one must not choose their words in different situations in respect of that situation and the others engaged in the conversation. These are natural learning processes through practice growth and understanding. There are those who understand this process use it as a leveraging mechanism for control. Aside from that factor I was observing this simple phenomena in which we all learn to communicate. I would suggest an observable healthy place, free of such calculation, in which we address each situation we find ourselves in. It comes down to a simple honest appraisal of any situation and the ability to communicate such clearly to our fellow(s). Now we all know if we over think such things we muck it up. When we first engage in the world many of us play with how to pre – frame our words to get the outcome we seek. Again this makes sense in certain situations though we all understand this is a learning a balance that is acquired through the natural engagement of communication. When a person calculates through thought too much to control the outcome it is usually transparent and when not transparent not a mutual engagement if not dishonest. The point being language is a cultivated tool for communication. We all must engage in this social interaction and we all have different aptitudes and outcomes. The digital interface exasperates the natural obstacle in this natural process synthetically. As a base ball player turns over a double play with out thinking about the act; as a friend catches a ball thrown bye his fellow to keep him on his toes their is a natural ease that comes with out strategy in real time engagement. The interface of computers is an obstacle to these natural proccess’s of growth and balance. The need to type or post on social media forces these poor habits of pre-meditation that are worked out through health engagement. The control and dependence that emerge in these spaces that are intended to be natural and free is unhealthy. If not dangerous and a betrayal of what it is to exist act engage and share naturally and freely. As anything else there will be those who understand these natural factors well and seek to capitalize on those who do not. The entire social media network with its technology and interface is this type of control system. This is not simply my opinion many whistleblowers who designed this digital interface made it clear they did so with the intent of manipulating these natural human processes; not much different than a drug dealer monetizing addiction. We always knew those who spoke freely with out affectation were healthy or grounded. Whether they choose to use such ease for manipulation for personal gain or accordance with actuality or perhaps compassion is another issue.