DISMANTLE TO DISARM

Human beings have the natural inalienable right of self defense. If a man has a gun and is threatening to shoot another the person being threatened has the right to disarm his assailant. Dual use technology is invented to be utilized as a weapon. Directed Energy Weapons are just as dangerous as a hand gun. Example:

Here are the injuries received from Directed Energy weapon attacks asserted by MI5 microwave weapons expert Dr Barrie Trower:

These are weapons. We need to organize through out the country and DISMANTLE TO DISARM. We do not need to destroy property or take any type of criminal act. We act in self defense as is our right. We dismantle to disarm with profressional technicians who know the tech or perhaps even those who installed the towers and dual use tech. All that the technician needs to do is take one key component out of the dual use weapon / device. The technician simply Removes the component and puts it in a box and the group returns it to the corporate owner in operational condition. We do not destroy the tower or dual use tech weapon- we simply DISARM IT. DISMANTLE TO DISARM we have the right to self defense. We need to organize a global grass roots movement. We do this with out permission of our failing government. We the People decide when & where and DISMANTLE TO DISARM. We must be prepared for the response that will most likely be forceful by local and federal law enforcement. This must be organized and done responsibly. My inclination is to state that those who have weaponized this infrastructure are waiting for anything to role out the DOMESTIC TERRORISM INDUSTRY they have waiting in the wings.

https://www.targetedjustice.com/next-gen-microwave-weapon.html: DISMANTLE TO DISARM https://targetedjustice.com/: DISMANTLE TO DISARM

* Sir Daniel Bethlehem QC was the principal Legal Adviser of the UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office from May 2006 to May 2011. Following his tenure at the FCO, he returned to practice at the London bar and is Director of Legal Policy International Ltd. and Consulting Senior Fellow for Law and Strategy at the London-based Inter- national Institute for Strategic Studies. 1 For a public statement of the position as it came to be in the second term of the Bush administration, see the remarks by John B. Bellinger III, the then Department of State legal adviser, at the London School of Economics: Legal Issues in the War on Terrorism (Oct. 31, 2006), at http://www2.lse.ac.uk/PublicEvents/pdf/ 20061031_JohnBellinger.pdf. 2 Harold Hongju Koh, Legal Adviser, U.S. Dep’t of State, Remarks at the Annual Meeting of the American Soci- ety of International Law: The Obama Administration and International Law (Mar. 25, 2010), at http://www.state. gov/s/l/releases/remarks/139119.htm. 3 JohnO.Brennan,AssistanttothePresidentforHomelandSecurityandCounterterrorism,RemarksattheHar- vard Law School Program on Law and Security: Strengthening Our Security by Adhering to Our Values and Laws (Sept. 16, 2011), at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/09/16/remarks-john-o-brennan-strength 1

This is the begining of PRE-EMPTIVE ACTION and the begining of a UNConstitutional re-writing or rather the implementation of an “pre emptive enforcement Alliance” under the umbrella of homeland security that places think tanks and multi juridictional tri-state round table be fore We The People and the semblence of a checks and balanced of the people government derived from the Declaration if Independence and American Constitution… It goes against our basic principles – regarding freedom and Contitution. It continues to spread out like a disease into the seperation of powers and institutions as we witness the rolling out this authotitarian pre-emtive Global “HEALTH” governance in this handling of the “Corona Virus”