” Any time We allow government to assume right powers, “authority”, during a crisis – We will see more crisis – They then create crisis…”
Tag: public health
Vera Sharav CITY HALL NYC gets to the heart of the matter a republishing of this 8-9-21 Publication … CONTROL ??? …
HzB Nov 20th 2021 Prof Mark Crispin Miller, a conversation after rally ( 1:44 ) Mr Miller addresses crowd (13:00) – (20:55) – closed with montage Spirit Drummz Kevin Nathaniel Sunga of the Valley Mr Bradshaw on trumpet accompanied with candlelight Freedom Fighter`s march a 1st amendment assembly … ??? …
Miller’s essays and articles have appeared in many journals, magazines and newspapers throughout the nation and the world, and he has given countless interviews worldwide, appearing in many documentaries, including Consuming Images (1989), The Merchants of Cool (2001), Orwell Rolls in His Grave (2003) and The True Cost (2015).
Miller is the editor of Forbidden Bookshelf, an e-book series that revives important works now out of print, most of which were variously killed at birth. Earlier he was the editor of two book series: Discovering America, published by the University of Texas Press, and, prior to that, Icons of America, published by Yale University Press.
In 2004, Miller wrote Patriot Act, a show that he performed for six weeks at the New York Theater Workshop. He is currently co-producing Four Died Trying, a documentary series on the assassinations of JFK, Malcolm X, Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr.
A recipient of fellowships from the Rockefeller, Ingram Merrill and Guggenheim Foundations, Miller is on the board of the Organisation for Propaganda Studies, an international consortium of scholars, and the Alliance for Human Research Protection, whose goal is to prevent, or correct, violations of informed consent in medical research.
Miller earned his bachelor’s degree from Northwestern University in 1971, and his doctorate in English from Johns Hopkins University in 1977. Although he specialized in Renaissance literature, Miller is best known as a media critic. Before joining New York University, Miller served as director of film studies at Johns Hopkins University. https://markcrispinmiller.com
… tip of the ol’ hat to Kevin, Cat and NY Freedom Rally organizors, Allan (Allen?) Thompson ART IS AUDIO … ALL THAT PARTICIPATED … POWER TO THE PEOPLE …
HzB … City Hall NYC (8-9-21) Cara Castronuova & Vera Sharav a conversation … ??? …
… this 1st amendment action, this rally ,will take place every Monday … come out and stand for your fellow Americans as they stand for you … We the People are a body of individuals lets stand together … Inalienable rights endowed by the creator (understanding the principle of separation of church and state) is in direct opposition of the “Authority” of Divine Right to “Rule” the crown of King George 3 & the Vicar the voice of god on earth and the church which anointed the royal bloodline dominion over the world … which justified the subjugation of nature ( that is you and your children, their subjects ) now the new organization/belief system is the religion of “science”anointed by the Godly”State” …
HITTING z BRICKS Activism … ??? …
HzB 6-26-21 Freedom march & rally Steve & former Big Pharma player protest Bruce Springsteen vaccinated only event
— Yale study covid messaging :
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04460703
- Home
- Search Results
- Study Record Detail
Save this study
COVID-19 Vaccine Messaging, Part 1
 | The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04460703 |
| Recruitment Status : Completed First Posted : July 7, 2020 Last Update Posted : July 21, 2020 |
Sponsor: Yale University Information provided by (Responsible Party): Yale University
Study Description Go to Brief Summary:
This study tests different messages about vaccinating against COVID-19 once the vaccine becomes available. Participants are randomized to 1 of 12 arms, with one control arm and one baseline arm. We will compare the reported willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine at 3 and 6 months of it becoming available between the 10 intervention arms to the 2 control arms.
Study participants are recruited online by Lucid, which matches census based sampling in online recruitment.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Vaccination COVID-19 | Other: Control message Other: Baseline message Other: Personal freedom message Other: Economic freedom message Other: Self-interest message Other: Community interest message Other: Economic benefit message Other: Guilt message Other: Embarrassment message Other: Anger message Other: Trust in science message Other: Not bravery message | Not Applicable |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 4000 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Intervention Model Description: | In this study, 2/15 of participants will be assigned to a control message (bird feeding passage), 3/15 of sample to a baseline vaccine message, and 1/15 to each of the 10 other treatment arms. |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Other |
| Official Title: | Persuasive Messages for COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: a Randomized Controlled Trial, Part 1 |
| Actual Study Start Date : | July 3, 2020 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | July 8, 2020 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | July 8, 2020 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
| Sham Comparator: Control Control message about birdfeeding | Other: Control message 2/15 of the sample will be assigned to the pure control group, which is a passage on the costs and benefits of bird feeding. |
| Active Comparator: Baseline message These participants will be assigned a message about the benefits of vaccination. All other treatment arms include this baseline language. | Other: Baseline message 3/15 of the sample will be assigned to a control group with a message about the effectiveness and safety of vaccines. |
| Experimental: Personal freedom Experimental message arm. | Other: Personal freedom message 1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this intervention, which is a message about how COVID-19 is limiting people’s personal freedom and by working together to get enough people vaccinated society can preserve its personal freedom. |
| Experimental: Economic freedom Experimental message arm. | Other: Economic freedom message 1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this intervention, which is a message about how COVID-19 is limiting peoples’s economic freedom and by working together to get enough people vaccinated society can preserve its economic freedom. |
| Experimental: Social benefit, self-interest Experimental message arm. | Other: Self-interest message 1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this intervention, which is a message that COVID-19 presents a real danger to one’s health, even if one is young and healthy. Getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is the best way to prevent oneself from getting sick. |
| Experimental: Social benefit, community interest Experimental message arm. | Other: Community interest message 1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this intervention, which is a message about the dangers of COVID-19 to the health of loved ones. The more people who get vaccinated against COVID-19, the lower the risk that one’s loved ones will get sick. Society must work together and all get vaccinated. |
| Experimental: Economic benefit Experimental message arm. | Other: Economic benefit message 1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this group, which is a message about how COVID-19 is wreaking havoc on the economy and the only way to strengthen the economy is to work together to get enough people vaccinated. |
| Experimental: Social pressure- guilt Experimental message arm. | Other: Guilt message 1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this message. The message is about the danger that COVID-19 presents to the health of one’s family and community. The best way to protect them is by getting vaccinated and society must work together to get enough people vaccinated. Then it asks the participant to imagine the guilt they will feel if they don’t get vaccinated and spread the disease. |
| Experimental: Social pressure- embarrassment Experimental message arm. | Other: Embarrassment message 1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this message. The message is about the danger that COVID-19 presents to the health of one’s family and community. The best way to protect them is by getting vaccinated and by working together to make sure that enough people get vaccinated. Then it asks the participant to imagine the embarrassment they will feel if they don’t get vaccinated and spread the disease. |
| Experimental: Social pressure- anger Experimental message arm. | Other: Anger message 1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this message. The message is about the danger that COVID-19 presents to the health of one’s family and community. The best way to protect them is by getting vaccinated and by working together to make sure that enough people get vaccinated. Then it asks the participant to imagine the anger they will feel if they don’t get vaccinated and spread the disease. |
| Experimental: Trust in science Experimental message arm. | Other: Trust in science message 1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this message about how getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is the most effective way of protecting one’s community. Vaccination is backed by science. If one doesn’t get vaccinated that means that one doesn’t understand how infections are spread or who ignores science. |
| Experimental: Not bravery arm Experimental message arm. | Other: Not bravery message 1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this message which describes how firefighters, doctors, and front line medical workers are brave. Those who choose not to get vaccinated against COVID-19 are not brave. |
Outcome Measures Go to
Primary Outcome Measures :
- Intention to get COVID-19 vaccine [ Time Frame: Immediately after intervention, in the same survey in which the intervention message is provided ]This is a self reported measure, immediately after the intervention message, of the likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccination within 3 months and then 6 months of it becoming available. During analysis, responses among those assigned to different intervention messages will be compared to those in the control group.
Secondary Outcome Measures :
- Vaccine confidence scale [ Time Frame: Immediately after intervention, in the same survey in which the intervention message is provided ]This is a validated scale. This scale will be used to assess the impact of the messages on vaccine confidence. (Outcome assessed only for the half of the sample that answers these items post-treatment)
- Persuade others item [ Time Frame: Immediately after intervention, in the same survey in which the intervention message is provided ]This is a measure of a willingness to persuade others to take the COVID-19 vaccine.
- Fear of those who have not been vaccinated [ Time Frame: Immediately after intervention, in the same survey in which the intervention message is provided ]This is a measure of a comfort with an unvaccinated individual visiting an elderly friend after a vaccine becomes available
- Social judgment of those who do not vaccinate [ Time Frame: Immediately after intervention, in the same survey in which the intervention message is provided ]This is a scale composed of 4 items measuring the trustworthiness, selfishness, likeableness, and competence of those who choose not to get vaccinated after a vaccine becomes available
Eligibility Criteria Go to
Information from the National Library of Medicine
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 18 years of age
- US resident
Exclusion Criteria:
- Younger than 18 years of age
- Non-US resident
- Do not consent
Contacts and Locations Go to
Information from the National Library of Medicine
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04460703
Locations
| United States, Connecticut | |
| Yale University | |
| New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510 |
Sponsors and Collaborators Yale University More Information Go to
| Responsible Party: | Yale University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT04460703 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2000027983 |
| First Posted: | July 7, 2020 Key Record Dates |
| Last Update Posted: | July 21, 2020 |
| Last Verified: | July 2020 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | Yes |
| Plan Description: | Anonymized data and analysis code will be posted in a public replication archive after publication. |
| Supporting Materials: | Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Informed Consent Form (ICF) Analytic Code |
| Time Frame: | After publication |
| Access Criteria: | Anonymized data and analysis code will be posted in a public replication archive |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: | No |
| Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: | No |
Keywords provided by Yale University:
| messaging |
HITTING z BRICKS Activism … ??? …
… video references regarding the conversation with the “first responder” the PCR tests from the inventor himself….
https://freeworldnews.tv/watch?id=60a8280ab72e4b4268fa84ba
BABBLE from the RABBLE EPISODE 13. QUOTE of the DAY, OBSERVATION of the DAY, BULLSHIT LINE of the DAY…
Vera Sharav, renowned champion of human rights and expert in biomedical research ethics, Ms. Sharav offers rare and valuable insights into the public health arena and state of emergency affecting each and every one of our lives.
( interview Stand for Health Freedom: https://standforhealthfreedom.com/blo…, https://standforhealthfreedom.com/act )…
QUOTE(s) :
1.’When medicine veer away from the hippocratic oath that promises to respects the individuals right to do no harm to the individual than you are going to harm the community as well because…” [opening of video/ interview]
2. ,,, history has told that story not fully but to a great degree … it’s un heard of that this should happen today in 2020 and this is called a civilized way to deal with a public emergency … I think each one needs to evaluate it themselves , it doesn’t matter whether I link it to Nazis… that’s not the point the point is what was done, what were the policies, what was the rational – they had a similar rational, remember, they wanted to get rid of what they called “worthless eaters”… – there economy was very bad at the time, this was war time, everything was going for the war and civilians didn’t have enough to eat, as well, there were shortages. This was their way of dealing with the folk. Forget the individual… what I am saying is when you eliminate the sanctity of the individual person you are crossing that line – you’re no better… [ 20:00 on video time line]
3. … it makes absolutely no sense in a medical way but if you have contracts and business to worry about I guess it makes sense – these babies are being used … it begins in the public health arena public health is government and that is what happened in Nazi Germany all of medicine ended up being “PUBLIC HEALTH” once you have medicine in partnership with government* there is no individual care the hippocratic oath goes out the window and since you have the government behind you the DR is not responsible for their actions they are working together with the state. THAT’S WHEN MEDICINE BECOMES WEAPONISED…AND WHAT I HAVE DESCRIBED IS WEAPONISED MEDICINE. IF THEY DICTATE WHAT MEDICINE IS GIVEN TO YOUR CHILD AND YOU DON’T HAVE A SAY THAT INVITES ALL KINDS OF SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF YOUR CHILD AND YOUR ROLE AS THEIR PARENT AND GAURDIAN…[33:03] * (DR JAMES GIORDANO WEAPONIZED NEUROSCIENCE)
4. … the media is very much a part of the business empire that is “RULING” that vaccines are an empire… and now they really want to do a vaccine globally – do you know what kind of a market that is? More than 7 billion people for a vaccine canyou even count the kind of profits no matter what they charge for it – that’s what there goal is thats the whole allure of the covid 19 vaccine. ITS THAT MARKET… BILL GATES SAID IT ON CAMERA RECENTLY ” WHAT’S A FEW BILLION DOLLARS WHEN WE ARE TALKING TRILLIONS”…
OBSERVATION:
Generally in health care our current problem is not covid 19 but the conflict of interest that exists between the * hippocratic oath taken by Drs in which the health of the patient is the priority ( individual rights) and comes before all else and the inherent conflic with law bound corporate priority of putting the corporations profits and share holders before all else * ( your individual rights)
BULLSHIT LINE :
Gatherings: Non-essential gatherings must be limited to 25 people maximum for both indoor and outdoor settings…
*( Mussillini’s definition if fascism is the merge of corporate & government )
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N02SK9yd60s
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpQYsk-8dWg ( the corporation documentry )
*https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC449835/
TRUTH TODAY@ THE BUNKER, HITTING THE BRICKS & JINGI PRODUCTIONS an INDEPENDENT MEDIA SOURCE 